The Equation Differing Across the Web

Mathematics can be a fascinating and sometimes perplexing subject. While some people find joy in solving equations, others struggle to wrap their heads around the complexities. One particular equation has recently sparked a heated debate online, with people passionately arguing over the correct solution.

The equation in question is: 8÷2(2+2). At first glance, it may seem straightforward, but the real challenge lies in determining the appropriate order of operations to use. This has led to two popular formulas being discussed: BODMAS and PEDMAS.

BODMAS stands for brackets, order of exponents, division, multiplication, addition, and subtraction. Advocates for BODMAS argue that the answer is one. On the other hand, PEDMAS, which stands for parentheses, exponents, division, multiplication, addition, and subtraction, suggests that the answer is 16.

One Twitter user, @KnaughtMonk, confidently proclaimed that the solution is one. They demonstrated their calculation using BODMAS: 8÷2(2×2) = 8÷2(4) = 8÷8 = 1. However, @NomeDaBarbarian disagreed, stating that the answer could be either one or 16 depending on which mathematician one listens to. This user emphasized that math is a language and the order of operations should not be viewed as an inflexible rule.

The conflicting opinions and passionate arguments from users like @gcfssea and others only add to the mystique of this seemingly simple equation. It’s reminiscent of those times when we found ourselves daydreaming in math class, gazing out the window and escaping into our thoughts.

This dispute is not the first of its kind to captivate the online world. Similar math problems have gone viral in the past, generating excitement and dividing opinions across social media platforms. For instance, the equation 48÷2(9+3) created a frenzy on platforms like Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube. People couldn’t agree on whether the answer was two or 288, once again invoking the debate between PEDMAS and BODMAS.

Mathematics has an intriguing way of challenging our minds, provoking lively discussions, and inviting us to explore different perspectives. So, what’s your take on this equation? Are you Team BODMAS or Team PEDMAS? Let the math battle begin!

Related Posts

He argued that decisions regarding the case should have been made by the Department of Justice rather than by the agency’s director alone. The former official further alleged that the agency applied different standards when investigating separate high-profile matters. He claimed that one investigation was quietly set aside, while another.

In a recent televised interview, a former senior government official voiced strong criticism of past actions by federal investigative leadership, alleging improper handling of high-profile cases during…

Trump’s Crypto Czar Drops Name Of Who Controlled ‘Biden’s Autopen’

In a fiery Fox Business interview, newly appointed Crypto and AI Czar David Sacks accused Senator Elizabeth Warren of using President Biden’s autopen to push anti-crypto policies….

On Status Of Investigation

Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Chairman Brendan Carr is set to meet with members of the Republican Study Committee this week to discuss regulatory concerns involving a major…

Former President Bill Clinton Speaks up

The conversation around leadership and accountability took center stage during a candid interview with former President Bill Clinton, aired on “CBS Sunday Morning” on June 1, 2025….

Federal Bill Proposes Citizenship Proof Requirement for Voter Registration

A bill requiring proof of citizenship for voter registration in federal elections has passed the House of Representatives with a narrow 220-208 vote. The legislation, known as…

No One Should Be Suprised

Two Judges Arrested Amid Allegations of Obstructing Immigration Enforcement Two separate incidents involving judges in Wisconsin and New Mexico have drawn national attention after both were arrested…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *