New York Judge Dismisses Bobulinski’s $30 Million Defamation Suit Against Fox’s Tarlov in Landmark Anti-SLAPP Ruling

In a ruling that could have widespread ramifications for media law and First Amendment protections, U.S. District Judge J. Paul Oetken dismissed a $30 million defamation lawsuit filed by Tony Bobulinski against Fox News co-host Jessica Tarlov. The lawsuit stemmed from a comment Tarlov made during a January 2024 broadcast of The Five, and its dismissal has set a significant precedent for future defamation cases in the media landscape.

Judge Oetken’s decision is the first to apply New York’s anti-SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation) statute in a federal court, and it’s a win for journalists and commentators in the face of politically motivated defamation suits. The court not only dismissed Bobulinski’s claims but also ordered him to pay Tarlov’s legal fees, which is mandated by New York’s anti-SLAPP law. This ruling signals a critical shift in how courts may address lawsuits designed to stifle public discourse and media reporting.

The Case: Tarlov’s Comment and Bobulinski’s Lawsuit
The lawsuit was sparked by a comment made by Jessica Tarlov during a discussion on Fox News’ The Five about Tony Bobulinski’s testimony before Congress regarding Hunter Biden’s business dealings. Tarlov stated that Bobulinski’s legal fees had been paid by a Trump Super PAC. Bobulinski, who has become a prominent figure in Republican-led investigations into the Biden family, immediately contested this statement and demanded an on-air retraction and apology.

Despite Tarlov’s subsequent clarification, in which she acknowledged that the payments were made to the law firm representing Bobulinski, not Bobulinski directly, the defamation suit was filed. Bobulinski, through his attorney Jesse Binnall, claimed that Tarlov’s remark harmed his reputation and professional standing, particularly with regards to his credibility as a witness.

Bobulinski sought $30 million in damages, claiming that Tarlov’s comment implied that his testimony had been bought by a Trump-aligned political entity, thus damaging his credibility and professional relationships. The lawsuit was framed under the premise that the statement was defamatory per se, meaning it was inherently damaging to Bobulinski’s reputation, and did not require proof of specific harm.

The Court’s Decision: Dismissal and Attorney’s Fees
Judge Oetken’s ruling was decisive in favor of Tarlov and Fox News. The judge granted Tarlov’s motion to dismiss the lawsuit, noting that Bobulinski failed to meet the high bar required to sustain a defamation claim, especially as a public figure. One of the critical points in the court’s reasoning was the lack of evidence that Tarlov’s statement was defamatory per se. The court found that the statement did not specifically harm Bobulinski’s professional reputation, as it did not accuse him of criminal activity or other conduct that would be disqualifying in his profession.

The court also addressed Bobulinski’s allegations of actual malice. To win a defamation suit, public figures must prove that the statement was made with actual malice—meaning the defendant either knew the statement was false or acted with reckless disregard for its truth. Judge Oetken noted that Tarlov’s prompt clarification, made the day after the original comment, undermined the claim of actual malice, as it demonstrated her willingness to correct any potential misunderstanding.

Related Posts

Invasive pest with deadly venom spreads across the US, triggers warning from scientists

Venomous Invasive Ant Spreading in the U.S., Experts Warn of Health Risk A venomous ant species capable of causing severe allergic reactions is expanding its reach across…

Elon Musk Claims “Magic Money Computers” in U.S. Government Issue Payments “Out of Thin Air”

In a bold claim that has sparked significant conversation, billionaire CEO Elon Musk told Texas GOP Senator Ted Cruz that the U.S. government uses “magic money computers”…

From Homelessness to a Cozy Haven: Woman Converts Old Trailer into Charming Tiny Home

In a touching display of resilience and creativity, a woman who once faced homelessness has turned a neglected, dilapidated trailer into a lovely tiny home that radiates…

Senate Delivers Bipartisan Rebuke to Trump’s Canadian Tariffs in 51–48 Vote

In April 2025, the U.S. Senate narrowly passed a resolution, 51–48, opposing President Donald Trump’s proposed 10% tariffs on Canadian imports. The bipartisan rebuke saw four Republican…

Jelly Roll gets emotional as Kelly Clarkson covers his song

Jelly Roll Moved to Tears by Kelly Clarkson’s Cover of “Save Me” Jelly Roll was deeply touched when Kelly Clarkson performed his emotional song “Save Me” on…

Kamala Harris Gives Her First Major Speech Since Leaving Office

In her first major speech since leaving office, former Vice President Kamala Harris took the stage at the Emerge 20th Anniversary Gala in San Francisco to deliver…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *