Texas Supreme Court Slows Abbott’s Push to Remove Democratic Lawmakers

The Texas Supreme Court has rejected Governor Greg Abbott’s request for an immediate ruling on whether Democratic lawmakers who fled the state can be removed from office, opting instead for a longer review process.

Abbott had urged the court to act within 48 hours after House Democrats left Texas in early August to prevent a quorum and stall a vote on new congressional maps. But instead of a fast-track decision, justices gave both sides three weeks to file briefs, with responses due by September 4 — well after the current special session is expected to end, according to the Texas Tribune.

Abbott and Paxton Align on Lawsuit
Despite the delay, Abbott framed the move as progress, saying the briefing schedule moves Democratic leaders “closer to consequences.” His lawsuit targets Rep. Gene Wu of Houston, chair of the House Democratic Caucus, while a separate suit from Attorney General Ken Paxton seeks to remove Wu and 12 additional Democrats.

Though Abbott and Paxton initially clashed over who had the authority to pursue the case, Paxton has since said he looks forward to working alongside the governor to “hold these lawmakers accountable.”

Democrats’ Quorum-Busting Tactic
On August 3, dozens of Democratic members left the state, denying the House enough members to conduct business. The walkout was intended to block passage of the GOP’s proposed redistricting plan, which was introduced after pressure from former President Donald Trump. Trump has called for maps that would give Republicans up to five additional seats in Congress, bolstering the party’s narrow majority ahead of the 2026 midterm elections.

Democrats argue the redistricting push is a partisan attempt to cement Republican control, while critics note that Democratic-led states have employed similar gerrymandering strategies in the past.

Historic Move on the Line
No Texas legislator has ever been forcibly removed from office for breaking quorum. The Supreme Court’s eventual ruling could set a precedent with major implications for both parties — particularly as redistricting battles intensify nationwide.

Related Posts

CNN’s Collins Tries Attacking Trump, It Backfires In SpectacuIar Fashion

CNN anchor Kaitlan Collins is once again trying to attack President Donald Trump this week by alleging that he has “shifted” from wanting a so-called “Muslim ban…

North Carolina News: Boyfriend of Ukrainian Woman Speaks Out After Train Tragedy Sparks Outrage

America is mourning the tragic loss of Iryna Zarutska, a 23-year-old Ukrainian refugee who came to North Carolina seeking peace, only to be killed in a senseless,…

Erika Kirk seen for the first time since her husband’s tragic death

When Air Force Two landed in Phoenix, silence fell across the tarmac. Charlie Kirk, the 31-year-old conservative activist whose assassination stunned the nation, was returning home for…

Trump Ally Gov. Mike Dunleavy Reportedly Eyeing Senate Challenge to Lisa Murkowski

Alaska’s political landscape may be in for a shake-up. Multiple sources close to Gov. Mike Dunleavy say he is preparing to enter the 2028 U.S. Senate race…

House Passes Bill To Scrutinize Taliban Funding

The Republican-controlled House of Representatives passed legislation aimed at limiting the Taliban’s funding from international governments and NGOs. The No Tax Dollars for Terrorists Act (H.R. 260)…

Schiff Could Face Fines, Prison Time if Classified Leak Allegations Proven

A Democrat whistleblower’s allegations, backed by newly declassified FBI interview reports, are now threatening to upend the political career of Sen. Adam Schiff (D-CA). If the whistleblower’s…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *