SCOTUS Rules Trump Admin Can Continue Mass Layoffs At Education Dept.

On Monday, the Supreme Court granted President Donald Trump another significant victory, approving mass layoffs at the Department of Education and enabling the administration to proceed with its plans to reestablish state control over schools.

In a brief, unsigned order, the justices paused a lower court ruling that had blocked Trump’s plan indefinitely. That lower court decision is now on hold while the case plays out—meaning the layoffs can begin immediately,” CNN reported.

Within hours, the Department of Education dispatched termination notices to employees who had faced layoffs in April, only to have a judge reinstate them. CNN obtained one of the emails, which told employees they would officially be out of a job on August 1.

“The Department appreciates your service and recognizes the difficulty of the moment,” the notice read. “This RIF action is not a reflection upon your performance or conduct and is solely due to agency restructuring, as described in previous correspondence.” A copy of the Supreme Court’s order was attached.

The left wing of the court wasn’t happy. Justice Sonia Sotomayor issued a fiery dissent, calling the ruling “indefensible” and claiming the majority was either “willfully blind” or “naive” to what she saw as a grave threat to the separation of powers. The other two liberal justices joined her.

Trump ordered the layoffs earlier this year, slashing the department’s workforce by 50 percent. But Biden-appointed Judge Myong Joun blocked the move, ruling the agency can’t be dismantled without Congress. That ruling came in response to a lawsuit from teachers’ unions and left-leaning education groups.

The 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals refused to overturn Joun’s ruling in June, so Trump took the case to the Supreme Court—and won.

The president praised the court’s decision on Truth Social.

“The United States Supreme Court has handed a Major Victory to Parents and Students across the Country, by declaring the Trump Administration may proceed on returning the functions of the Department of Education BACK TO THE STATES,” Trump wrote. “Now, with this GREAT Supreme Court Decision, our Secretary of Education, Linda McMahon, may begin this very important process.”

McMahon called the ruling a “significant win for students and families.”

“Today, the Supreme Court again confirmed the obvious: the President of the United States, as the head of the Executive Branch, has the ultimate authority to make decisions about staffing levels, administrative organization, and day-to-day operations of federal agencies,” she said.

McMahon added that while it was unfortunate the Supreme Court had to get involved, the department will now get back to work fulfilling its mission.

“We will carry out the reduction in force to promote efficiency and accountability and to ensure resources are directed where they matter most – to students, parents, and teachers,” she said. “As we return education to the states, this Administration will continue to perform all statutory duties while empowering families and teachers by reducing education bureaucracy.”

Judge Joun’s original ruling accused the Trump administration of trying to gut the department without authorization, writing that the planned layoffs would “likely cripple” it. He ordered the reinstatement of 1,400 employees who had been terminated.

Sotomayor echoed that same concern, accusing the administration of ignoring its legal responsibilities and trying to shut down the agency without waiting for Congress.

“Rather than wait for legislative action to begin shuttering the Department, McMahon slashed the agency’s work force in half, concededly without analyzing the effect of those terminations on the Department’s statutorily mandated functions,” Sotomayor wrote.

She claimed the court’s ruling would “unleash untold harm” by stripping away federal protections for students facing discrimination or civil rights violations.

“The majority apparently deems it more important to free the Government from paying employees it had no right to fire than to avert these very real harms while the litigation continues,” she wrote.

Related Posts

Trump Rips Schumer’s Criticism Of Asia Trip, Levels Serious Allegation

President Donald Trump forcefully rejected Senate Minority Leader Charles E. Schumer’s criticism of his trip to Asia, calling the New York Democrat’s remarks “almost treasonous.” “Worked really…

An Eight-Year-Old Boy Helped a Child Trapped in a Locked Car, Making Him Late for Class and Get Scolded – But Soon Something Unexpected Happened

Running Late An eight-year-old boy was sprinting down the street, his backpack bouncing on his shoulders. He was already late for math class, and in his mind…

“A millionaire saw his ex-girlfriend begging on the street with three children who looked just like him — what happened next will break your heart.”

“A millionaire saw his ex-girlfriend begging on the street with three children who looked just like him — what happened next will break your heart.” It was…

GOP Senators Join Democrats to Overturn Trump’s Tariffs on Brazil

In a rare moment of bipartisan alignment, the U.S. Senate voted Tuesday to repeal President Donald Trump’s tariffs on Brazilian imports — marking one of the most…

Newsom’s $20/Hr. Fast-Food Minimum Wage Law Backfires

Two years after California Governor Gavin Newsom signed the FAST Recovery Act with cameras flashing and union leaders cheering, the law is leaving a trail of layoffs,…

Michelle Obama reveals sad reason she never wore braids in White House !

For 8 years, Michelle Obama lived in the White House, abiding by the roster of responsibilities that made up her role as First Lady. However, only recently…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *