Former President Obama has a twisted plan for what he believes should happen regarding speech online, and it is terrifying.
The former president believes that the government should have the power to develop “restraints” over what can, and cannot, be posted online in order to avoid having “disinformation” and “misinformation” spread.
Obama made the comments when he spoke to historian and author Heather Cox Richardson at The Connecticut Forum on June 17, 2025.
“I’ve said this before, but I always repeat it. You and I can have an opinion about this little side table. You know, you might not like the design, you might not like the color or how it’s finished, but we can have that discussion,” former President Obama said.
“If I say to you this is a lawnmower, you’ll think I’m crazy. And if I really believe it, I’ll think you’re crazy. And we’re now in a situation in which we are having these just basic factual arguments,” he said to the historian.
“And that further undermines trust. And those in power, those with money, exploit that space in which nobody knows what’s true. Vladimir Putin and the KGB had a saying that was then adopted proudly by Steve Bannon, which was if you want propaganda to be effective, you don’t have to convince people that what you are saying is true,” he said as he attempted to make his draconian case.
Obama just came out advocating for mass online censorship.
“We want diversity of opinion. We don’t want diversity of facts.”
Right after his party lied about COVID, lockdowns, vaccines, the border, the autopen, and Joe Biden’s mental acuity.
Not to mention Epstein. pic.twitter.com/r1nsDksSF4
— Emergent Perspective (@_emergent_) June 20, 2025
“You just have to flood the zone with so much poop. They use a different word. But you have to flood the zone with so much untruth, constantly, that at some point people don’t believe anything,” noted Obama.
“So it doesn’t matter if a candidate running for office just is constantly, just hypothetically, saying untrue things, or if an elected president claims that he won when he lost and that the system was rigged, but then when he wins, then it isn’t rigged, because he won,” he continued in what appeared to be an obvious reference to President Donald Trump.
“It doesn’t matter if everybody believes it. It just matters if everybody starts kind of throwing up their hands and saying, well, I guess it doesn’t matter,” he said.
“And that’s what’s happened. That’s what’s happened in one of our major political parties. You have a whole bunch of people who know that’s not true, but we will pretend like it is. And that is dangerous. But part of what we’re going to have to do is to start experimenting with new forms of journalism and how do we use social media in ways that reaffirm facts, separate facts from opinion,” said Obama.
“We want diversity of opinion. We don’t want diversity of facts. And how do we train and teach our kids to distinguish between those things?” Obama asked.
“That, I think, is one of the big tasks of social media. By the way, it will require some government, I believe, some government regulatory constraints around some of these business models in a way that’s consistent with the First Amendment, but that also says, look, there is a difference between these platforms letting all voices be heard versus a business model that elevates the most hateful voices or the most polarizing voices or the most dangerous, in the sense of inciting violence, voices. And that, I think, is going to be a big challenge for all of us that we’re going to have to undertake,” he said.
