Veteran Democratic strategist James Carville sharply criticized former President Joe Biden this week, suggesting that he should retreat to his home in Rehoboth Beach, Delaware, and remain there.

Speaking on the “Politics War Room” podcast, Carville, who has previously voiced concerns about the Democratic Party’s shift toward “woke” ideology, placed full responsibility for Biden’s damaged legacy on the former president himself. He argued that Biden’s political missteps have alienated both the public and his own party, making him a liability as the Democrats prepare for future elections.

“What he has done has led to a situation where no one wants to hear from him anymore. He should just go to his condo in Rehoboth and remain there. This is not a reflection of our character; it is entirely his doing. This entire situation is a result of his choices,” Carville said, adding that even the Democratic Party has distanced itself from Biden.

Carville also rejected Biden’s claim that he could have defeated Donald Trump in the November election had he remained in the race. He dismissed the notion outright, stating, “No one f***ing believes that at all!”

He further commented on reported tensions between Biden, Jill Biden, and Alexandra Pelosi, adding, “Look, you had a distinguished career. Your final act was unfortunate. It’s time to step aside. The party is moving forward. It’s truly sad, but that’s the reality. He is solely responsible for this situation. He has no one to blame but himself.”

Carville’s comments reflect a broader concern among Democrats who worry that Biden’s leadership has weakened the party’s position. Many believe his policies and public presence are hindering the Democrats’ ability to rally voters ahead of the next election cycle.

Meanwhile, President Donald Trump is actively working to dismantle Biden’s climate agenda through a series of executive orders aimed at boosting domestic fossil fuel production. One of these orders declares an “energy emergency,” shielding the administration from legal challenges that could obstruct drilling and energy development.

According to Just the News, these executive actions could mark the most significant shift in U.S. energy policy since the response to the 1973 oil embargo. Experts suggest that Trump’s moves could reshape the country’s approach to energy independence and regulation for years to come.

Upon taking office, Biden had reinstated the U.S. in the Paris Agreement and introduced various regulatory measures to curb emissions, including new appliance efficiency standards, restrictions on liquefied natural gas exports, and stricter EPA regulations on power plants. These policies were aimed at addressing climate change, but they also faced criticism for potentially increasing energy costs and limiting domestic energy production.

Trump’s recent orders, however, prioritize mining critical minerals, expediting approvals for energy projects on public lands, and enhancing energy infrastructure development. One order specifically focuses on expanding energy resource development in Alaska, an area long contested in debates over environmental protection and economic growth.

Additionally, Trump’s actions reverse several of Biden’s final measures against fossil fuels, including restrictions on offshore drilling. Trump has also withdrawn the U.S. from the Paris Agreement once again, cementing his opposition to Biden’s climate policies and signaling a stark departure from the previous administration’s environmental goals.

Jeff Reynolds, senior editor of Restoration News, suggested that Trump’s aggressive dismantling of Biden’s policies stems from lessons learned in his first term. He argued that Trump is now more determined than ever to roll back regulatory measures that he sees as hindrances to economic growth and energy independence.

“Now he understands the underlying issues, and he is prepared to aggressively dismantle everything that obstructed him previously,” Reynolds told Just the News.

Trump’s executive actions signal his commitment to his “drill, baby drill” campaign promise. However, energy analyst David Blackmon cautioned that substantial increases in U.S. production remain uncertain despite these policy shifts. While the Trump administration’s push for deregulation may encourage energy investment, broader market forces and international dynamics will ultimately determine the extent of the impact on production and prices.