Mathematician Explains Correct Answer To Viral Math Problem

You’re bored, and you decide to search for math problems to solve only to find yourself at your wit’s end trying to figure out how to solve this tricky problem.

This math problem is not new. You may have seen it a couple of times on social media. And once every two or three years, it goes viral again to test both kids and adults in solving this grade school math problem.

This equation was already shared millions of times on Facebook and has taken people’s time in solving this tricky problem.

What’s funny is that this simple equation even sparked debates around the world as to what is the proper way of solving the math problem.

Are you one of the people who tried solving this too?

The trick question
Here is the tricky and viral math problem:

6÷2 (1+2)

It may look tricky because of the different answers that we are getting, but this is more of a simple math problem that only gets confusing because of how you solve it.

YouTube channel MindYourDecision posted how it’s actually very easy to solve this problem. According to the video’s description:

“I explain how to get the correct answer by using the modern interpretation of the order of operations. I also explain how you would get a different answer under historical usage of the division symbol.”

Before we can solve this math problem, we need to refresh our memory about the PEMDAS rule and the order of operations.

(If the same precedence, then solve left to right)

Now that that is clear, here’s how you solve the problem.

6÷2 (1+2) = 9, and here’s why
The answer to the math problem 6÷2 (1+2) is 9!

How did we get this answer? Here’s the breakdown.

Keeping PEMDAS in mind, the math problem should look like this:

6÷2× (1+2)

Now, P stands for parentheses, so the first thing that you would do is 1 + 2 = 3, hence:

6÷2× (3) or 6÷2× (3)

Again, with the PEMDAS rule, multiplication and division have the same priority, so we should evaluate this from left to right.

6÷2 = 3 then 3 x 3 = 9

Now, MindYourDecisions also tried another order of operations from the old textbook about the historical usage of 1917.

Here’s how some people solved the problem:

Using the order of operations, the one in the parenthesis comes first, so

6÷2 (1+2) = 6÷2 (3)

Then, you multiply 2 and 3 to get 6 which makes it 6÷6 = 1.

While there is a valid justification for the old computation, the correct answer would still be 9 since this is how we would interpret the equation today.

Come to think of it, answering these types of tricky math problems are a great way to spend your free time. Plus, you are also developing strategic solving skills.

Related Posts

Latest poll surprises with 2028 race contenders and fresh insights into Trump’s approval in the US

A new national poll has offered surprising insights into the political landscape ahead of the 2028 U.S. presidential election. The Emerson College Poll not only highlights a noticeable…

After Controversial Military Strike, Public Calls for Barron Trump to Enlist Spark Heated Debate

As political tensions rise overseas, so too does the public scrutiny here at home. And for the Trump family, that scrutiny has taken an unexpectedly personal turn—aimed…

Ocasio-Cortez Won’t Run For Top Committee Spot as 2028 Rumors Swirl

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) has confirmed she will not pursue the top Democratic position on the influential House Oversight Committee, putting to rest speculation that she might…

‘Good Riddance’: Sen. Kennedy Lambasts Justice Jackson Over Universal Injunction Dissent

Louisiana Republican Sen. John Kennedy said he was “proud” of the Supreme Court following a Friday ruling that he argued must be good for the country—if only…

Senate Confirms Dan Caine To Lead Joint Chiefs In Late-Night Vote

The Republican-controlled U.S. Senate has voted to confirm retired Lt. Gen. Dan Caine, President Donald Trump’s candidate for chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. The 60…

Noem Supports Criminal Charges Against CNN For Anti-ICE App Promo

Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said during a Monday interview she believes that CNN could be legally liable for promoting an app that tracks Immigration…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *